458 cases · 37 threads
Show
2023 · Gunung Padang, Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia

Gunung Padang: a buried pyramid 25,000 years old?

Sourced, unconfirmed
Strength D · 3/10
Evidence 1/4 · Witnesses 1/3 · Backing 1/3

Peer-reviewed geophysics with cores, but the paper was retracted over its dating; no excavation of the deep layers.

Plausibility Low
Score 5 · 5 factors for, 2 against

Real geophysics showing layered structure under the hill, but the 25,000-year dating was retracted and nobody else has confirmed it.

See the factors ↓

Disputed
Standing stones and heaps of columnar andesite on the terraces of Gunung Padang, Cianjur, West Java (2019). · Arie Basuki / Wikimedia Commons
When2023
WhereGunung Padang, Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia

An Indonesian team led by geologist Danny Hilman Natawidjaja scanned the Gunung Padang megalithic site with radar, seismic and resistivity tools and drilled cores, and argued in 2023 that the hill hides a man-made pyramid begun about 25,000 years ago. The journal retracted the paper in 2024 because the dated soil was not shown to be man-made. The underground layering itself was not the reason, and the authors stand by their work.

How plausible · Low

Real geophysics showing layered structure under the hill, but the 25,000-year dating was retracted and nobody else has confirmed it.

  • ●●
    Access The team scanned and cored the site.
  • ●●
    Consistent over time The same finding since 2011.
  • ●○
    No gain sought Academic work.
  • ●○
    Character record A national research agency geologist.
  • ●○
    Checkable details check out Data published before the retraction.
Against
  • −
    Contradicted by an insider Retracted over the dating, not the geophysics (half weight; the authors dispute it).
  • −
    Lone source, no corroboration One team; no independent survey yet.

Plausibility weighs how well an account fits where secrecy hides the documents by design, so missing records never count against it. Strength measures what is documented. Assessed 2026-10-23.

Claims

GPR, seismic tomography, resistivity and drill cores show the hill is a layered, man-made structure, with the oldest construction about 25,000 years ago.firsthandSourced, unconfirmedDanny Hilman Natawidjaja et al., Archaeological Prospection (2023)
Archaeological Prospection retracted the paper in March 2024: the radiocarbon-dated soil was not shown to be man-made or tied to human activity.firsthandOn the recordArchaeological Prospection retraction notice (via Retraction Watch)
The retraction is censorship; the subsurface structure stands.Under the pyramidsfirsthandSourced, unconfirmedNatawidjaja and co-authors

Connected cases

People and organizations

Threads · click one to see it on the board

Sources

A research project by Igor FrancePrivacy